Thursday, November 03, 2011

The OtB 2011 Offseason Blueprint


When we started creating the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook two years ago, the idea was to place the reader in the position of the Twins general manager. We would provide as much information about the organization from top to bottom, as well as the free agent market, for the reader to make the most educated  

It feels as if there is some common misconception that Bill Smith is making all the offseason decisions by himself in a bubble. True, his position is where the buck stops however Mr. Smith is not alone in the process. He has recommendations and suggestions from various sources within the organization. Some may have one solution for shortstop while another may have a completely different answer for the middle infield problem. The general manager must take all of these ideas into consideration and devise a plan of action. In essence, that’s what we at TwinsCentric have attempted to provide you in our Offseason GM Handbooks – the chance to take all of the available information, a handful of recommendations and ultimately make your decision for the 2012 Twins season.

To take it one step further, we highly advise that you jot together what your 2012 roster would be for the Twins. As Nick Nelson outlined earlier in the week, if you send us your blueprint (send to TwinsCentric@gmail.com) we’ll send a copy of our forthcoming Maple Street Twins Annual 2012 to an entrant drawn at random.  

So pick up a copy of the 2011 TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook and study up. Until then, here’s my recommendation from that eBook:

(1) Let Michael Cuddyer and Jason Kubel walk.

As difficult as it will be for clubhouse morale, the market will likely make Cuddyer’s contract too rich of a deal to keep the aging outfielder around. Outside of his leadership, his versatility and ability to crush left-handed pitching will be sorely missed. Jason Kubel too will be forced out of the club based on his increased pay scale. At just 29 years old, it will be difficult to watch him go as he has raked when healthy. At the very least, the Twins can take comfort in knowing they will receive a pair of supplemental pick in the 2012 draft further rebuilding a pipeline that hasn’t function well as of late.

(2) Offer arbitration to Francisco Liriano, Kevin Slowey, Alexi Casilla and Glen Perkins.

(3) Trade for Colby Lewis.

I don’t recommend building through trades with the current status of the organization – the farm system is gruel thin at the top and sparse in key positions throughout. But Colby Lewis’s ability to throw 200 innings at a pauper’s rate is too attractive to pass up.

Texas is rumored to be looking at Yu Darvish and will also be interested in keeping C.J. Wilson as well. With those two combined with three other young arms it might make the 31-year-old Colby Lewis expendable. Lewis a very good pitchers hidden behind some m’eh numbers the past two seasons (26-23, 4.06 ERA but 56 HRs allowed in 64 games) and owed just $3.25 million in 2012. Arlington’s hitter-friendly environment did not play well to Lewis’s style as the strike-thrower had 22 home runs tagged off him at The Ballpark. A season at Target Field should cure what ails him there.

The Twins made inroads to signing Lewis before the 2010 season after his successful Japan campaign but were thwarted by the Rangers – the organization who gave Lewis his first chance. The question is what would it take for the Twins to acquire him now? For the most part, the Rangers are set for the next several years in both the offense and pitching departments. But they need for space and Lewis’s gopher ball tendencies may help decrease his value in Texas’s eyes. Meanwhile, the Twins don’t have much in terms of MLB-ready prospects so it may take some lower-level prospects to entice Rangers GM Jon Daniels to make a deal. I’d offer Bruce Pugh, the 22 year old relief prospect who struck out 75 in 64 innings split between Fort Myers and New Britain, and Michael Tonkin, 21 year old reliever with 69 strikeouts in 76.2 innings at Beloit. Both prospects have very good upsides but Lewis is a very cheap and reliable starting pitcher.

(4) Trade Kevin Slowey (and prospect) to Colorado for catcher Chris Iannetta.

With Lewis in the mix, this creates an opportunity to move Kevin Slowey whose salary will be, uh, embiggering. From Minnesota’s perspective, right or wrong, Slowey has become what some suggest is a malcontent, a player who rejected his initial assignment out of spring camp and has been constantly dealing with minor injuries. Meanwhile, Iannetta, also sidelined with injuries, is a right-handed catcher who is capable of starting. 

The Rockies need to further improve their rotation for 2012. After trading Ubaldo Jimenez to Cleveland this past year, they may lose veteran Aaron Cook and will be left with a myriad of solid prospects (Drew Pomeranz headlining that group) that might not be ready for the big league role. Slowey’s experience, upside (he has a very good 4.70 K/BB ratio in his career) and two seasons of club control still ahead may be enticing enough to Colorado to move their one-time starting catcher. His shaky outings in 2011 won’t be enough to pry away Iannetta and will like require another prospect.

For the Twins, Iannetta represents the thing that they desperately needed this season when Joe Mauer broke down – a legitimate starting catching option. The right-handed hitting Iannetta has put up outstanding numbers since assuming regular duties in Denver back in ’07. Among those catchers with a minimum of 1000 plate appearances, Iannetta’s offense, with a .347 wOBA, has been the seventh-best trailing such luminaries as Mauer, Jose Posada, Victor Martinez and Brian McCann. Of course, with your home stadium up in the mountains, you can’t ignore the influence of the altitude. For Iannetta, this has meant a home OPS 162 points higher than when he is outside of the Rockies. Admittedly, this doesn’t necessarily bode well for a transition over to Target Field.

What Iannetta does possess are attributes such as patience (a 13.9% career walk rate) and the ability to slaughter left-handed pitching (a career .252/.391/.520 hitter against southpaws). These factors should play well for the Twins who have lost Michael Cuddyer to free agency and can use Iannetta in a DH role versus tougher lefties, if necessary.

It is possible that Mauer is able to catch the bulk of games this season but Iannetta is the insurance policy that they should have had ready in Wilson Ramos.

(5) Sign free agents David Dejesus (1 year, $5.5M), Derrek Lee (1 year, $5M), Clint Barmes (2 years, $8M) and Laynce Nix (1 year, $1.5M).

David DeJesus is coming off a down year as well as two straight with his thumb issue but he is still an elite defender in the corner outfield position. In right field for the A’s last year, his Plus/Minus rating of +21 plays was the second-best in that position. Offensively, he’s a near-perfect candidate for the two-spot as he has a high on-base history (career .356 OBP) and decent speed (Orlando Hudson-ish level). I believe he is primed for a rebound season because he suffered from the dreaded unlucky BABIP year. A line drive hitter by nature (over 20% line drive rate), DeJesus also hits a ton of grounders but held a .183 BABIP on those in ‘11 – well below his career norm of .245. This should correct itself in 2012 and he should hit closer to his career line of .284/.356/.421 once again.

While many thought Derrek Lee was washed up or overmatched by American League pitching early this year, a late season surge has some thinking there is something left in the tank. Following a trade to Pittsburgh, team doctors discovered that Lee had a bone fracture in his hand and sat out most of the month of August. When he returned in September, the healthy Lee went 29-for-83 (.349) with five home runs. He’s particularly attractive to the Twins as he uses the big part of the field, hitting line drives to center over 22% of the time. He can play first well in the event Justin Morneau is unable to go but his main focus should be as the designated hitter.

Yes, the Twins have plenty of internal options at short but all of them are shaky at best. Barmes has been a very good defender at short. When he was the starter in Colorado in 2006, his defense was the second-best according to the Plus/Minus system. Given the starting role again in Houston this year, he finished third among shortstops defensively. His offensive is substandard but for a contact-oriented team like the Twins, 2010 showed how vital it is to have high-caliber defenders.

Finally, the Twins are going to need some depth and versatility on the bench. I am keeping Tsuyoshi Nishioka (plays middle infield, should improve) and Trevor Plouffe (infield and corner outfield) but will add Laynce Nix as a fourth outfielder and pinch hitter. Defensively, Nix has been a decent corner outfielder, has performed well against right-handed pitching (.792 OPS since ’09) and has 123 pinch hits in the past three seasons (fifth-most in that time).

Now on to the bullpen…

(6) Sign Octavio Dotel (1 year, $3.75M) and Michael Wuertz (1 year, $1M)

The Twins skimped on bullpen arms last year. This is fine if they targeted the right individuals but instead they wound up with Dusty Hughes and Jim Hoey. Glen Perkins proved that he is capable of being a high-quality set-up man but the rest of the ‘pen was in shambles. Fortunately, we can retain Joe Nathan, Perkins and move Brian Duensing to the pen to handle left-handed heavy portions of the opponents’ order.

Dotel would give the Twins a strikeout guy and is very effective against right-handed opponents. In fact, since 2009, he has struck out 32.6% of righties faced – sixth-best in that time – while holding them to a .179 batting average against. If able to be locked in for just the one year, he would be a very good compliment to Perkins in the late innings role.

To take a page out of the Rays’ playbook, Wuertz is the kind of inexpensive talent they would roll the dice on. Sure, he’s got plenty of problems, he has suffered shoulder injuries the past two seasons, his fastball’s velocity was down to 88-mph last year and his command was nearly non-existent. However, because of his slider that he favors, he still was able to get a swing-and-miss at a very high clip (12.4%). In the season’s first-half, he was effective, throwing 25.1 innings with a 2.49 ERA and a good 23/12 K/BB ratio. On top of that, he held opponents to a .189 batting average against. From July onward he struggled mightily, throwing 8.1 innings with a 9/14 K/BB ratio and a repugnant .476 batting average against. For a million bucks (or more hopefully a minor league deal), the gamble that Wuertz can regain his early season success is merited.

After these moves, this is what you end up with for the 2012 season:

(Click to embiggen)

This roster addresses some of the team’s more critical needs including middle infield defense, adding professional hitters, bench depth, strengthening the rotation and putting a power arm in the bullpen. With the exception of Lewis and Iannetta, all moves were made without dipping into the farm system. Likewise, payroll was pared down to near $110 million. 


Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Despite fewer innings, Denard Span gets glove love


John Dewan and company at Baseball Info Solutions announced their winners for the 2011 Fielding Bible awards. And just like the Gold Gloves, the Twins were once again shut out. However some members of the team actually received a scattering of votes including Denard Span, Ben Revere, Joe Mauer, Drew Butera and Nick Blackburn.

To me, the most surprising to see was Span.

A year ago, Span was completely left off of the list. At that time, I was somewhat flabbergasted by the development. While Span did not look entirely comfortable out in center field for the first time, he still managed to put up respectable fielding numbers (including by Dewan’s own accounting system, the Plus/Minus). Frankly, I felt as if he were a top ten defender despite all of the miscues.

One of the reasons Span had difficulties in the field in 2010 was his new environs. A Twins insider told me during last offseason that Span struggled at Target Field as the alleged wind current that helps push fly balls back onto the field in the right-center gap also affected plenty of other fly balls on the field. This was difficult for Span to adjust to. Without the home/road UZR split that was once available at Fangraphs.com, there’s no way of seeing if that was indeed an influential factor.

Limited to 585 innings in the field in 2011, Span looked much improved in his fielding. Based on observation, he appeared more confident playing the in-between flies and captained the outfield much better. The metrics also support this. According to the revised zone rating, a number similar to fielding percentage which calculates the number of plays a center fielder should make in a designated zone, Span had his jump from .935 in ’10 to a MLB-best .969 in ’11. He committed just one error this past season versus four in 2010. In the end, his flawed yet often telling UZR/150 stat shot up from 4.5 last year to 17.6 this season.  

There’s no question he was a better defender yet it is interesting how he went from zero consideration in 2010 – no votes at all among the 10-judge panel – to getting top five nods, including a number three choice from Bill James and one overall mark from the honorable Peter Gammons. To summarize, the voters a year ago thought 22 other center fielders were more worthy of Fielding Bible votes over him but this year he’s shot up to number one in Gammons’ book.

While I don’t begin to understand why exactly it is that Span went from an afterthought to a frontrunner, I can speculate that the ones who did vote highly on Span likely did so based on the aforementioned series of stats – the Revised Zone Rating (RZR) and UZR/150. Fangraphs leaderboard has Denard Span leading all candidates with a minimum of 500 innings in the RZR category and a somewhat distant third in the UZR/150:

Center Fielders by UZR/150 (min 500 innings)
Name
Inn
RZR
OOZ
UZR
UZR/150
Carlos Gomez
569
0.918
61
12
27.5
Franklin Gutierrez
763
0.949
51
15.2
27.1
Denard Span
585.1
0.969
51
9
17.6
Andres Torres
776
0.95
62
8.7
17.3
Jacoby Ellsbury
1358.1
0.949
91
15.6
15.7
Ben Revere
776.1
0.948
81
8.5
15.1
Nyjer Morgan
724.2
0.935
73
7.1
13.4

(via Fangraphs.com)


Frankly, Span looked good enough in 2010 to earn some top ten or top five votes. In limited time in the field, he certainly displayed that type of play as well this year.

While the outcome of his concussion is still a huge unknown – you can look no further than teammate Justin Morneau to see how volatile it is – Span was able to come back at the end of the season and log some playing time. That may be a positive sign for 2012. If he is able to return to playing condition and perform this well on the field in addition to providing pre-concussion offensive numbers (.300/.367/.392 in 251 plate appearances), the Twins will have a very formidable up-the-middle defender and top-of-the-lineup hitter

For more on the Twins’ 2012 lineup and outlook, check out our TwinsCentric Offseason GMHandbook.

Monday, October 31, 2011

Quick Hits: Nathan eyeing the Mets, Madson a Twins option & more Iwakuma


Joe Nathan told reporters during a ceremony for the dedication of the baseball field which will bear his name at Stony Brook University in New York that the Mets “are going to be on my radar”.
Seeing as this was in New York and covered by local reporters, it is only natural that the question regarding the Mets’ closer vacancy comes up. I do believe that his answer is more lip service than a genuine interest in the team. That said, there will be plenty of teams who should have him on their radar as well. His second-half performance suggests that he is capable of providing high-quality work and his recent injury history coupled with his age likely equates to a bargain price (in years and dollars). In the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook, we have him scheduled for a contract for two-years at $7 million per.

In my personal offseason blueprint, I had encouraged re-signing Joe Nathan for the $7M but after more consideration – and depending how the market develops for Nathan – I’m leaning towards giving Glen Perkins a chance as a close and build the bullpen from the bottom up rather than the top down. Perkins has the capability and stuff to be a solid closer and in the small sampling he compiled in 2011, he seemed to work well in high leverage situations (2.83 xFIP). This would save the team $5 million to address other needs.
Regardless of who assumes the closers role, the Twins bullpen needs plenty of attention this offseason - one way or another. 

Newsday’s Ken Davidoff released his annual MLB free agent rankings and predictions. Among them, Davidoff thinks that the Phillies closer, Ryan Madson, will sign with the Twins for a three-year, $27 million contract.
Madson has been a very productive reliever in the Phillies bullpen since 2003 but last season was his first sustained shot at being the team’s closer. He responded well by working in 62 games while posting a 2.37 ERA with a solid 62/16 K/BB ratio. He’s armed with a mid-90s fastball that he complements with a devastating changeup – one that has been baseball’s best since 2009 according the Fangraphs.com’s pitch value (25.3 runs above average). This past season opponents missed on 57% of their swings while hitting just .085 off of it.

He’s a high strikeout, low-walk rate type of reliever that the Twins under normal circumstances would be interested in. The problem is I just do not see the Twins investing three years in to any one for the bullpen. After all, it was one of the reasons (for better or worse) they refrained from re-signing either Jesse Crain or Matt Guerrier at the end of the 2010 season.
Again, similar to the Nathan situation, I believe the Twins would be better served not committing that money to a closer but earmarking that payroll towards filling other needs in the rotation, bullpen and middle infield. 

One potential Twins starting pitching target, Hisashi Iwakuma, made his intentions known regarding his desire to play in the US, saying he was going to “exercise international free agency.”
The Twins have had interest in the 30-year-old Iwakuma as recently as last winter so there will likely be explorations with his agent to see what sort of money he will be looking for. Last year, he was rumored to have been seeking a high sum out of Oakland to which the A’s were not willing to pay. Now, without the hindrance of purchasing his negotiating rights from his Japanese team, Iwakuma figures to make it to the MLB as a B-level free agent this year.

He’s stacked up inning in Japan and completed plenty of games. So if a better option like Mark Buehrle is not willing to leave Chicago, Iwakuma shares a similar profile to Buehrle and could draw attention for other suitors. In theory, he’s got better stuff (including a splitter that has been compared to Dan Haren’s) but it is hard to tell if that will play well on this side of the Pacific as those pitchers making the transition have had mixed results. 

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Would re-signing Joe Nathan be a good idea for Twins?


The Twins announced on Tuesday that they have officially declined the $12.5 million option on Joe Nathan for 2012. Yet, according to general manager Bill Smith, Nathan remains a very viable candidate to return to the team for 2012, only on a lesser salary:
"I spoke with Joe and his agent this morning, and expressed our interest in re-signing [him]. We will remain in contact with them as we move forward into the free-agent process.”
In the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook, we noted that the closer free agent pool is littered with similar arms to Nathan and we pegged his as the fifth-best among right-handed closers on the market. We estimated that his contract would be approximately two-years, $14 million – a very reasonable rate given his performance record, age and injury history. The question is: Would that be a good investment for the Twins?

Yes, Nathan came back a bit prematurely last year and was cuffed around (a fact that was definitely predicted). From April through May, he worked 15.1 innings, allowed 15 runs on 17 hits and posted a sad 15/9 K/BB ratio. In that time he received swinging strikes on another 8%. That figure was particularly disheartening considering the lowest rate he held since converting to a closer with the Twins was a 12% swinging strike rate.

Because of these results, he went on the DL and then the Twins sent him to Rochester to try to work through some stuff. ESPN1500’s Phil Mackey reported that during his time with the minor league club, Nathan was able to work through some scar tissue that had formed on his elbow, providing him with a great range of motion in his throwing arm. After breaking up the scar tissue, Nathan’s season got back on track. In his final 31 appearances, he worked 29.1 innings allowing only 11 runs and held a significantly better 28/5 K/BB ratio coupled with an opponent average of .193 (not to mention, 11 saves in 12 opportunities). What’s more is that in the season’s final two months, he had increased his swinging strike rate to 11%.

Thanks to dissipated scar tissue, Nathan was able to turn his season around. First, he was able to regain velocity on his fastball:

Joe Nathan’s 2011 Fastball Velocity
Month
Miles Per Hour
March/April
91.3
May
91.7
June
92.6
July
93.0
August
93.3
September/October
91.9
 (via Fangraphs.com)

As you can see, Nathan peaked a bit in August before losing some heat on his fastball. This is perfectly normal. Due to it being his first year back since 2009 as well as the natural bell-curve effect of pitcher’s seasonal velocities, a decline at the end of the season is not unexpected. Still, the improvement in not only his velocity but also his fastball’s effectiveness in the second-half of the year was impressive.

Since he no longer had the build-up on his elbow restricting his motion, Nathan was able to spin his slider – arguably his best pitch – better in the latter portion of the year. 

In the first-half of the season, he struggled to locate the pitch where he wanted it. You can see that visually here:


This scatterplot of sliders resulted in a whiff rate of 13.3% on this pitch. Comparatively, this was a pitch that held a 21.3% whiff rate from 2008 to 2009. Clearly, lacking his velocity combined with a substandard slider, opponents were able to tee up on the pitches they liked instead of fishing for a slider darting out of the strike zone or a fastball above it.

Following his recovery in Rochester, Nathan returned with a much more lethal slider. Over the course of the next few months, he increased his whiff rate to 24.6% while spotting his slider down-and-away from right-handed hitters:



This improved secondary offering complemented his jazzed up fastball which changed hitter’s line of vision much better than in the season’s first-half. The results were more strikeouts and less solid contact.

At 37 years old in 2012, he’s no spring chicken but the progress he made in final three months of 2011 signifies that he is certainly capable of holding down the backend of the Twins bullpen for the next two seasons.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Perkins is worthy of Twins top pitching honor


Twins relief pitcher Glen Perkins let the cat out of the bag through his Twitter account, telling the world before the organization could announce it that he was the recipient of the team’s Pitcher of the Year Award in addition to winning the Most Improved Award.


Perkins put together a phenomenal if unexpected season in the bullpen. After injuries eroded his velocity which was hitting 97 miles per hour in 2007 yet had dropped to 89.7 as of 2009, he was suddenly able to dial it back up again – averaging 94 miles per hour on his fastball. With that solid foundation, he expanded the strike zone with his slider leading to one of the best out-of-zone chase rates of the year (37.8%). He posted solid conventional numbers – a 2.48 ERA and 65-to-21 strikeouts-to-walks ratio in 61.2 innings – and according to Fangraphs.com, Perkins finished the year with the 11th-highest Wins Above Replacement among all relievers.  
Without question, his newfound velocity played a significant role in his rebound but it is his slider that was the real weapon. As noted above, Perkins was able to throw his slider out of the strike zone and incite plenty of swings. What’s more is that the majority of those swings on his slider proved fruitless as he held a 40% swing-and-miss rate on the pitch says Inside Edge’s data. All in all, Perkins’s slider was 9.9 runs above average by Fangraphs.com’s measurement. That was the fifth-best among all sliders.
Interestingly enough, it is a pitch that he did not incorporate into his repertoire until he came up to the majors. In 2009, Perkins told Seth Stohs that he was spending time refining the pitch, one that he developed midway through the 2008 season:
I ramped up my offseason workouts and also spent much time talking to people and also practicing throwing my slider.  It is a pitch I started throwing midseason and I am committed to making that a reliable pitch for me.
But it is clear that his success with the pitch goes beyond just being dirty. Perkins simply knows how to use his arsenal. In a sit-down with Upper Deck Report’s Brandon Warne this summer, Perkins outlined a scenario which explains why he has been so dominating against hitters, particularly when using his slider:
“I find that I’ll throw a fastball or two, and if they’re late, I know that I can throw a slider and that they’re going to have to cheat to try to hit the fastball, and before they can stop themselves, they see it’s a slider. That’s been the thing for me, mixing the fastball and the slider, and throwing them at the right time, whether it’s starting with the slider or finishing with the slider. Throwing those pitches at the right time and recognizing what the hitter is trying to do, and using that to my advantage has gone really well for me.

The other day, McGehee was late on two sliders, and I threw three more. Two were bad, and then the third one was down-and-in where I wanted to put it, and he swung over it. He was probably cheating on the fastball, and had to get his hands ready. It was a situation where I recognized what he was trying to do, and went the other way. I think that’s as much as anything like command, velocity and movement, is trying to realize what a hitter’s trying to do to you, and adjusting from there. But obviously, the harder you throw, the easier those things are to do.”
Here we see that aforementioned slider he threw to the Brewers’ Casey McGehee:
What we see is excellent location of his slider, placed in a spot where a hitter can do nothing but flail over the top of it. Because McGehee is cheating fastball, he is expecting the pitch to be a knee-high fastball and commits to swinging. Halfway home, the bottom drops out on the ball and it darts towards the ground, leaving McGehee unable to hold up his swing.  The Brewers’ infielder is not the only one to fall victim to this approach as Perkins had K’d nearly 30% of right-handed opponents faced – a remarkable rate for a left-handed pitcher.
As analyst try to make sense to Perkins’ meteoric rise in the pen, some wanting to believe it was a fluke or the product of a small sample size, being healthy, developing a deadly slider and having keen understanding of his opponents has propelled his 2011 season. He has become a pitcher, not just a thrower.
Perkins is one player the Twins will need to make a decision on this winter but the decision shouldn’t be too difficult. He is arbitration eligible and his salary figures to double however the $1.8 million we have estimated in the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook is a very reasonable cost for a dominating relief pitcher. On the free agent market, his service may have been twice that over three years. So, while the rest of the bullpen personnel remain a mystery, Perkins will be a fixture in the ‘pen come spring.