
Thursday, July 24, 2008

Sunday, July 20, 2008
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
The Third Base Trade Candidates
It seems to be a shared conclusion between the frequently warring Hatfield Twins media and the Maccoy Twins blogosphere to agree that the line-up needs an injection of a right-handed bat that can handle left-handed pitching. Neither Craig Monroe nor Delmon Young have lived up to expectations in that regard and Michael Cuddyer's timetable of return is still up in the air. Looking at the Twins' third baseman's slugging compared to the American League average leaves no doubt:
| Slugg. as 3B | Twins | AL | Diff |
| 2005 | .394 | .428 | -.034 |
| 2006 | .374 | .442 | -.068 |
| 2007 | .323 | .427 | -.107 |
| 2008 | .371 | .424 | -.054 |
Adrian Beltre | Seattle Mariners | 29-years-old
Contract: $12-million in 2008, $12-million in 2009 (Has limited no-trade clause with 8 teams)
| vs. LHP - 2008 | PA% vs LHP | BB% | K% | HR/PA | avg | obp | slg | lhp-rhp slg diff. |
| Beltre | 22.9% | 17.7% | 8.0% | 22.5 | .351 | .467 | .554 | +.144 |
| AL RHB Avg | 48.7% | 10.0% | 16.2% | 38.2 | .269 | .345 | .426 | +.023 |
Validity? La Velle E. Neal reported recently that the Twins front office made the inquiry regarding Beltre to the remnants of whatever is left of the Mariners front office after the Bill Bavasi fallout to whomever was available to answer the phone. There is no indication as to how far the trade discussions went. Perhaps they spoke to a janitor.
What Will It Take? In terms of liquidable parts on the Mariners roster, Beltre might fetch the highest ransom on the roster. Contrary to what is written by Twins fans in various comments on Strib blogs, it will take more than just offering Boof Bonser, Livan Hernandez and Brian Duensing. The Mariners are in need of pitching to bolster their farm system which is one of the commodities that the Twins have an abundance of. If you look at USS Mariners' Future Forty list of the franchise's prospects, you realize that besides those prospects that are currently occupying the bullpen at Safeco, the organization is extremely thin for cheap pitching in the near future. Seattle is committed to Carlos Silva, Jarrod Washburn and Miguel Batista through 2009. Sixty percent of the Mariners rotation is 12-29 with only Washburn and his 4.95 era the only one under 5.00. Those three are due a collective $30.35-million in 2009 with Washburn and Batista coming off of the ledgers after that season which leaves the Mariners with King Felix Hernandez and the possibility of Erik Berdard (if he is resigned after his contact expires after this season). With RA Dickey, the knuckleballing Rule 5 pick nabbed from the Twins this past offseason, assuming some of Bedard's starts while he is on the disabled list, the ideal of adding Bonser or Hernandez to the deal might appeal to the Mariners as they struggle to divvy up innings among failing starters. Bonser is still young enough to have the Mariners consider accepting him into their rotation. Hernandez would just digest the innings until the miserable season at the SoDo ballpark concludes. So that would leave the Mariners looking beyond 2009 which would require some of the young arms developed by the Twins system.
Why? Obviously the Twins haven't been able to acquire the third base package at TJ Maxx. Mike Lamb looked good on the rack but didn't fit right once we brought him home and eventually he worked his way from starting third baseman to taking up valuable space on the roster when Brian Buscher was recalled from Rochester and produced in the way they Twins expected Lamb too. There are several options of course, using an inexpensive and passable platoon of Brian Buscher and Matt Macri - a combination that may be satisfactory but would never propel a team deep into the post-season. Not only would Beltre aide in this season's post-season run, but the biggest appeal is that his $12-million dollar contract for 2009 does not look as outlandish as it once did when he was signed in 2005. The Cubs are due to write a check for nearly $16-million to the 30-year-old Aramis Ramirez who is hitting .253/.349/.387 against lefties and is ranked 24th among major league third basemen according to the Fielding Bible Plus/Minus (which is a stark contrast to his 2007 season where he ranked 4th overall). Beltre is ranked 2nd overall defensively among third baseman behind Scott Rolen. A season and a half of Beltre is worth the prospects and $12-million when you contemplate the cost of purchasing that kind of talent on the free agent market.
Kevin Kouzmanoff | San Diego Padres | 26-years-old
Contract: Through 2008 at $0.41. Arbitration eligible. Currently has 1.08 years of major league service.
| vs. LHP - 2008 | PA% vs LHP | BB% | K% | HR/PA | avg | obp | slg | lhp-rhp slg diff. |
| Kouzmanoff | 29.3% | 4.4% | 22.3% | 28 | .311 | .366 | .534 | +.132 |
| NL RHB Avg | 35.4% | 10.0% | 15.9% | 35.4 | .275 | .352 | .440 | +.046 |
Validity? Based on heresay and speculation. The Padres have super prospect 24-year-old Chase Headley who is, by all accounts, a better defensive third baseman with a higher upside and are in the market for major league ready pitching. The Padres' GM Paul Depodesta on his blog addressed that the Padres should actually be sellers - a fact shared by 80% of the Padre Nation.
What Will It Take? Similar to the Mariners, the Padres have two aging pitchers whose contracts are expiring at the end of this season. Certainly Greg Maddux might Brett Favre everyone and keep coming back and the Padres might pony up to resign Randy Wolf for any tour of duty, but the organization could also use a Boof Bonser addition to eat some of the innings this season. Bonser might find the confines of Petco Park to be beneficial to his pitching style. Past 2008, the Padres have two solid arms in double-A San Antonio, Will Inman and Scott Garrison, who are both throwing well in the Texas League, turning the legal drinking age this season but could possibly stand one more season of minor league experience in 2009. Another one of the aforementioned Missions' rotation-mates is the 24-year-old Matt Buschmann also pitching extremely well. In fact, Inman, Buschmann and Garrison are first, second and third among strikeout leaders in the League. On top of a Bonser or a Duensing, it would probably require a Jeff Manship (or at least a propsect in high-A or lower) to be added to the deal.
Why? Kouzmanoff is young and inexpensive and mashes left-handed pitching. That is about the gist of it. He doesn't have any patience so the higher on-base percentage is due to his high average on batted balls in play and not due to being able to draw a walk. His peripherals in that respect are closer to Delmon Young than Adrian Beltre who would wait and draw a walk. His defense is suspect-to-terrible. He received an A- for his ability to charge a bunt but is limited in his movement towards short. If the Twins think they can get Kouzmanoff to understand the strike zone better (which hasn't happened with Young or Carlos Gomez), Kouzmanoff would be a less expensive addition than Beltre. Then again, the Twins have been burned by the bargain shopping lately and might be better suited investing a bit more for Beltre. However, targeting Kouzmanoff and dealing with Paul Depodesta might be a way to get reliever Heath Bell (50 innings, 21.1% k%, 1.78 pLI) to fulfill that bullpen need in a one-stop shop.
Garrett Atkins | Colorado Rockies| 28-years-old
Contract: Through 2008 at $4.38-million. Arbtration elegable. Currently has 3.07 years of major league service.
| vs. LHP - 2008 | PA% vs LHP | BB% | K% | HR/PA | avg | obp | slg | lhp-rhp slg diff. |
| Atkins | 20.9% | 6.0% | 3.6% | 11.8 | .461 | .494 | .789 | +.388 |
| NL RHB Avg | 35.4% | 10.0% | 15.9% | 35.4 | .275 | .352 | .440 | +.046 |
Validity? The Twins had made several investigative phone calls last year around this time to see if there was anything the Rockies desired. The word was the they were asking for the moon for him - even with uber-prospect Ian Stewert ready to produce the same at Coors but for what will be a fraction of the price. The asking price may have been steep considering the Rockies were only 5 games out of the NL West race at the trade deadline and felt like they could compete (rightly so). This season with 8.5 games between them and the NL West front-running Diamondbacks, the idea that the Rockies will part with Atkins at a reasonable amount is not far-fetched.
What Will It Take? Prior to the Cleveland Indians' collapse and subsequent in-season rebuilding, there was plenty of speculation that there was a move to be made between the two franchises - as Casey Blake was not the third baseman of the future and once crown-jewel Andy Marte is essentially an afterthought. The speculation was that the trade would require the Indians to part with Aaron Laffey (or Jeremy Sowers) as the centerpiece of the trade. The desire behind Laffey is that the Rockies are obviously focused on acquiring groundball pitchers to offset the homer-friendly Coors Field. You can bet the first words out of the Rockies' mouths will be, Nick Blackburn, who has the history of being a groundball pitcher in the minor leagues. At this juncture in the season Blackburn might be close to untouchable. Outside of Blackburn, Brian Duensing is basically a slightly older verison of Aaron Laffey, but gets slightly fewer groundballs, but might be passable as a trade candidate for the Rox. And Zachery Ward is a slightly more erratic (10%) Duensing with the ability to get the strikeout (20%) as well as the groundball (57%) but the 24-year-old is experiencing double-A for the first time this season so he is less than major league ready.
Why? The power is hard to argue with but it could also be Coors Field induced as well. Like his lefty-righty split, his home-road split is just as pronounced as he is slugging .189 points lower away from the Mile High City. He is still an elite candidate but you can believe that he wouldn't be fetching nearly as high of a ransom had his value been based on hitting at Dodger Stadium or Progressive Field all this time. At the same time in his career Atkins has hit a home run every 31 plate appearances at Coors and hit a home run every 25 plate appearances on the road. Even if Atkins proves that Coors was his performance enhancement, Atkins would still be under the control of the Twins only through the 2009 season, at which point he becomes a free agent, and then the Twins regain one prospect back through the Free Agent Draft.
Friday, July 11, 2008
The Friday Flotsam
* The PiPress's Tom Powers is suggesting the Twins pick up the recently jettisoned Richie Sexson to address several needs, most notably the ability to hit left-handed pitching. This, of course, would mean that the Twins would have to do the same to one member of their roster as the Mariners did to Sexie. Mike Lamb seems to be a logical candidate as the Twins have an overwhelming amount of players that can handle third base plus the left-handed Brian Buscher who is produce in the way the Twins wanted Lamb to when he was signed in the winter. One obvious reason that the Twins wouldn't release Lamb is that they are still committed to paying him $3 million dollars in 2009. Even at the cost of discarding $3 million plus and adding the 34-year-old Sexson who may or may not be washed up, the Twins might be desperate enough to execute a move such as that. Craig Monroe, the right-handed bat the traded for in the off-season, was acquired because he was hitting .260/.311/.467 in his career against lefties but is hitting a paltry .127/.225/.225 in 80 plate appearances this season. Sexson has had better career average against lefties (.265/.369/.510) and is doing better against lefties this season, hitting .344/.423/.623 in 71 plate appearances. Sexson would be limited to designated hitter but could also displace first baseman Justin Morneau for a night off (however Sexson has an atrocious glove, ranked 30th among major league first baseman according to the Fielding Bible Plus/Minus). Using Sexson ONLY against left-handed pitching would be the ideal deployment, however, Geoff Baker with the Seattle Times reports that the main reason to cut Sexson was his "body language" displayed when manager Jim Riggleman limited him to left-handed pitching. "I think he would have given us power immediately against left-handers," Riggleman said. The cost of adding the right-handed dh against left-handed pitching and late-innings pinch hitter to the roster would be approximately $4 million-plus (on top of the $390K league minimum payment), the amount the Twins would owe Mike Lamb, and the possible addition of someone who is unsatisfied with their role. BUT the Twins wouldn't have to package anyone in a trade (like they did in the futile Phil Nevin deal). Is this a desirable acquisition?

Thursday, July 10, 2008
Carlos Gomez versus Jacoby Ellsbury: A Statistical Comparison
at the plate:
|
| pa | xbh% | k% | bb% | avg | obp | slg | isop | wpa |
| C. Gomez | 377 | 24.2% | 23.6% | 3.7% | .266 | .301 | .370 | .104 | -1.37 |
| J. Ellsbury | 339 | 22.5% | 14.7% | 9.4% | .268 | .341 | .375 | .107 | 0.24 |
batted balls:
|
| babip | infield hits | bunt hits | gb% | fb% | ld% | hr/fb% | pulled% | middle% | opposite% |
| C. Gomez | .340 | 13 | 21 | 41.9% | 41.0% | 17.0% | 5.3% | 46.2% | 27.0% | 26.6% |
| J. Ellsbury | .303 | 13 | 6 | 49.6% | 27.2% | 22.0% | 7.2% | 32.2% | 31.8% | 35.8% |
performance as a leadoff man:
|
| pa | obp | team runs | team runs per inning when leading off | runs per inning by team when not leading off | difference | runs/rbi |
| C. Gomez | 140 | .286 | 91 | .65 | .53 | +.12 | 23/2 |
| J. Ellsbury | 129 | .326 | 88 | .68 | .54 | +.14 | 29/4 |
|
| pitches | pitches per pa | taken% | swung% | taken for ball% | taken for strike% | swung - in zone% | swung - ooz high% | swung - ooz low% | swung - ooz inside% | swung - ooz outside% |
| C. Gomez | 1281 | 3.39 | 45% | 55% | 66% | 34% | 64% | 8% | 13% | 3% | 13% |
| J. Ellsbury | 1240 | 3.65 | 58% | 42% | 64% | 36% | 75% | 2% | 6% | 8% | 9% |
This is where the minutia, each pitch, explains the statistic provided above. There is an obvious correlation to these numbers and the aforementioned difference in their strikeout rates and walk rates but it could enlighten us to why Gomez is more of a fly ball/ground ball hitter and Ellsbury is more of a ground ball hitter. First, the two vary in their plate approach vastly. Gomez is more of a swinger (55%) while Ellsbury practices patience (58%). Oddly enough, even though Gomez is far more impatient than his Boston counterpart he has taken more pitches for balls than Ellsbury. Again, here is where another schism between the two players reside. Seldom does Ellsbury take a hack at a pitch that finds its way out of the zone. 75% of the balls Ellsbury has swung at have been inside this zone. This plate awareness is the reason behind 72% of Ellsbury's batted balls either being a ground ball or a line drive. Conversely 36% of the time Gomez has taken swings at pitches out of the zone. As you will note, he has swung at 13% of balls that have been low and 13% of balls that have been outside (there has to be some overlap to account for all of the low-and-away sliders that Gomez has swung at). The low pitch will undoubtedly led to ground balls or fly balls. Judging from Gomez's uppercut swing I would be inclined to believe that is why he is lofting more balls than driving them.
on the bases:
|
| sb% | runs gained through sb | net bases gained* |
| C. Gomez | 72% | 0.28 | +3 |
| J. Ellsbury | 83% | 3.32 | +28 |
*From BillJamesOnline.net encompassing opportunities to advance
from 1st to 3rd, 2nd to home and 1st to home and the time executed in addition to grounded into doubleplays.
Carlos Gomez has speed. That goes without saying. He has performed admirably on the turf where he has recorded 13 stolen bases, an 86% success rate on the artificial substances. Natural grass, however, might as well be a swimming pool for all the good it has done to his foot speed. Fifteen times Gomez has tried to swipe bases and only 8 times he has been successful (53%). His runs gained through his 21 stolen bases has barely amounted to a quarter of a run. All the running has done little for the Twins offense. Ellsbury has speed as well. As opposed to Gomez, Ellsbury has thrived on the crushed brick dirt, stealing 33 of his 35 runs outdoors. This movement has added 3.3 more runs for the Red Sox.
Furthermore, the BillJamesOnline.net has charted the amount of opportunities to go from 1st to 3rd, 2nd to home and 1st to home combined with the amount of doubleplays grounded into and stolen bases. They have found that Ellsbury has a great deal more bathpath awareness as he has netted 28 bases as Gomez has only attained 3 additional bases. Naturally, the age difference comes in to play but far too often I have heard that Gomez's base-running indiscretions are credited to his lack of professional experience. It should be noted that Gomez has played 114 more professional baseball games than Jacoby Ellsbury.
|
| innings | range factor | revised zone rating | throwing errors | fielding error | kills | expected outs | outs made | plus/minus | mlb cf rank |
| C. Gomez | 730 | 3.27 | .939 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 262 | 270 | +17 | 1 |
| J. Ellsbury | 299 | 2.50 | .951 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 93 | +3 | 13 |
Defense is the category in which Gomez outshines Ellsbury by a landslide. Currently under John Dewan's Fielding Bible Plus/Minus rankings, Gomez is the number one centerfielder in the major leagues. Ellsbury defensive talent has landed him at number 13. Gomez has an overzealous arm (a strong arm at that) has led to four throwing errors but has also erased two base runners at the same time. Base-runners have had 88 opportunities to take an extra base and only 49 (.557 pct) ran on Gomez's arm. The scouting reports highlight Gomez's arm which is why more runners do not attempt to take the extra base however, I question his accuracy at this juncture in his career. Nevertheless the two kills and the .557 advance percentage ranks Gomez's arm as 18th among centerfielders. Ellsbury has zero kills and has had 26 of 39 base-runners advance on him (a .667 advance percentage) which slots his arm as the 30th overall among centerfielders.
As indicated above in the base-running statistics, both outfielders have notable speed. This has manifested itself through covering added ground. Gomez's speed has given him a hefty range factor and has allowed him to track an additional 8 outs that were not expected to be converted. Ellsbury, in his fraction of time in center, has tracked down only one additional out.