Friday, July 09, 2010

Trading Kevin Slowey?


In the midst of speculations involving Seattle’s Cliff Lee, one major league source has cited the Mariners’ interest in Kevin Slowey as a key piece of a potential deal. As the Mariners compile their due diligence, hoping to leverage the trade deadline’s best trading chip for the highest possible return, those that are in the “Acquire Cliff Lee Now” camp should hope that Seattle’s scouts were not paying attention to the Twins starter the past several weeks: In his last five starts, Slowey has been tagged for 35 hits in 24.2 innings of work leading to 24 runs scored.
While Lee would improve a rotation that is down on its luck at the moment, the long-term sustainability of the organization has to be considered when measuring any trade. Slowey is still young, affordable and has compiled an impressive minor league track record that would suggest this is a hiccup. Then again, with the recent surgically repaired wrist less than a year ago, Slowey may be experiencing difficulties adjusting to what he described in the spring as a new sensation and wondered aloud if he would “ever feel the same like I did before.”
The obvious reality is that his stuff just isn’t quite there in 2010. While he is still master of the strike zone’s domain - throwing strikes regularly and working ahead of hitters - the opposition is raking line drives and deep fly balls all over league. As a point of order, Slowey has always been near the bottom of the league in inducing worm-burners, but this season his groundball rate has sunk to a new low of 27% - the lowest in baseball by a wide margin.
The added elevation off of opponents' bats correlates with the loss of movement in his breaking pitches. Although his fastball remains a very effective pitch in his repertoire, his secondary pitches, the curveball and slider, has not had the same results from prior seasons:
Slowey’s Curve/Sliders
Pct Thrown
Chase%
Miss%
Groundball%
2010
14%
16%
11%
28%
2009
21%
30%
19%
41%
2008
23%
36%
25%
40%
(via MyInsideEdge.com)
Essentially, hitters have strayed after fewer out-of-zone pitches and missed less frequently. In short, he’s not fooling anybody with the breaking action.
Reviewing his pitch f/x virtualization charts - which are the average path that a pitcher’s pitches take from the release point to the catcher’s mitt, as shown from a bird’s-eye view – reveals that his arsenal is not producing the same movement as it had in the past. Give additional attention to the green diamond, his slider:
Slowey - 2008
Slowey - 2008
 
             
Slowey - 2009
Slowey - 2009
            
      
Slowey - 2010
Slowey - 2010
   
As you can derive from those graphs, on average, Slowey’s non-fastball offerings are flat and catching far too much of the strike zone. As a result, hitters have been able to cause damage by posting a 1.095 OPS on his curve/slider (versus a .609 league-average OPS on those types of pitches). Losing confidence in a pitch (or pitches) for a control-orient pitcher can have nasty consequences. As Jesse Lund at TwinkieTown.com pointed out, Slowey basically eliminated throwing any semblance of a breaking pitch in his most recent start in Toronto, throwing 87 fastballs out of 98 pitches. This pitch selection led to two home runs and nine hits in 6.1 innings in Canada.
The real question then is if this is a temporary setback or if it is indeed the reprecussions of his wrist surgery that may have long-lasting effects. Basically, would trading Slowey now be a "sell-low" maneuver for the Twins, allowing the Mariners benefit from his continuing production when he fully recovers, or would it be an unloading of a commodity that is slightly damaged and may never live up to expectation? The answer to that is the difference between a bad trade and a good one.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Running themselves out of first place?


The Twins have developed a reputation for being a team that hustles all over the base paths, implementing an aggressive approach, and taking an extra 90 feet or more when the opportunity presents itself. More than that, they’ve often been lauded as doing so intelligently. According to an audit of the team’s baserunning on BillJamesOnline.net, the Twins’ results on the bases have radically changed from the prior two seasons.  

In 2009, the Twins scampered around the bases fairly liberally. Through their efforts, the team netted 42 additional bases going first to third, second to home and first to home while avoiding outs. Factoring in the 72% success rate of their stolen bases and the 2009 team gained approximately 63 bases above average. The year prior to that, the Twins netted 49 additional bases through hustle and another 18 by way of theft. This gave the Twins a positive 67 bases. This was good enough for sixth and third in the American League in those consecutive seasons. This season, the Twins have posted a -20 mark, the second-lowest total in the AL and their worst since the disappointing 2005 season.

Minnesota Twins
  1st to 3rd  
2nd to Home
1st to Home
DP
Bases
BR
BR
SB
Net
Year
Adv
Opp
Adv
Opp
Adv
Opp
Opp
GIDP
Taken
Outs
Gain
Gain
Gain
2002
72
222
105
186
25
68
1148
121
175
21
+33
-45
-12
2003
81
238
128
208
25
59
1273
139
186
28
+31
+6
+37
2004
63
218
105
172
25
65
1157
130
168
44
-6
+24
+18
2005
59
243
109
195
18
62
1089
154
153
46
-65
+14
-51
2006
87
275
131
218
24
58
1193
163
186
47
-10
+17
+7
2007
89
240
119
198
26
64
1159
148
154
60
-55
+52
-3
2008
82
245
139
233
28
66
1254
144
211
47
+49
+18
+67
2009
94
328
130
208
33
72
1265
146
197
41
+42
+21
+63
2010
48
161
68
113
20
49
625
95
90
26
-32
+12
-20

Totals
675
2170
1034
1731
224
563
10163
1240
1520
360
-13
+119
+106
31%
60%
40%
12%
    (via billjamesonline.net)



What’s more is that this drop in production on the bases could correlate with the depressed scoring totals overall. Consider this, in 2008 and 2009, the Twins plated more than 5 runs per game. This year, the scoring total has dropped to roughly league average at 4.6 runs per game. If you look over the past several years, a pattern emerges:

Twins on the Bases:
Net Gain on Bases
Runs Scored Per Game
2004
+18
4.8
2005
-51
4.3
2006
+7
4.9
2007
-3
4.4
2008
+67
5.1
2009
+63
5.0
2010
-20
4.6


The explanation for such a downturn in the 2010 Twins’ Net Gain involves the higher volume of Twin-killings. While averaging a 12% double play rate from 2002 to 2010, the team is currently posting a 15% rate this season. These two-for-ones have erased numerous runners and muted potential rallies. The simple solution to this problem is to actually get more aggressive, such as starting runners when groundball-prone hitters like Joe Mauer are batting in double play situations.

Likewise, the Twins coaching staff have failed on several occasions to realize the limitations of their players. Jason Kubel leads the team with six outs on the bases, two of which were the results of Kubel getting burned at home plate. 

While aggressiveness on the bases is still very much a part of this year’s team’s DNA, the outs on the bases has adversely affected the scoring. Part of the blame goes towards not altering their approach in double play situations and not understanding their personnel’s limitations (a few of Kubel’s six outs on the bases is due because of poor decisions to send him). Once again, it goes back to being intelligent on the bases. Improving the efficiency by avoiding outs would greatly assist in bolstering the bottom-line.